Document ingestion
Connectors for file stores, wikis, databases, ticket systems and email, with incremental sync.
Answers drawn strictly from your approved documents, with citations and permission-aware retrieval.
RAG is the difference between a system that sounds confident and one you can audit. We build the full pipeline — ingestion, chunking, embedding, hybrid retrieval, reranking and grounded answering with source citations — and we measure retrieval quality separately from answer quality, because they fail for different reasons.
If more than one of these is familiar, there is usually a case worth scoping.
Every item below is a deliverable you receive, not an activity we perform.
Connectors for file stores, wikis, databases, ticket systems and email, with incremental sync.
Chunk boundaries that respect document structure, with metadata retained for filtering and citation.
Semantic similarity combined with keyword matching, so exact identifiers and part numbers still work.
A reranking pass over candidates to put genuinely relevant passages ahead of merely similar ones.
Every claim traceable to the passage it came from, linked so users can verify.
Your permission model applied during retrieval, not filtered after the fact.
Separate measurement of retrieval recall and answer correctness, plus logging of unanswered questions.
Each of these is a bounded job with a measurable result, which is how we prefer to scope a first build.
Staff ask in plain language and get a cited answer from policy, SOP and product documentation.
Turns manuals nobody reads into an answer engine, with links to the source page.
Ask across a document set and get the clause, the page and the surrounding context.
Accurate product, pricing and policy answers while the representative is still on the call.
Suggests the approved answer and its source to the agent handling the ticket.
An indicative architecture. The final design follows your systems, data boundary and constraints.
SharePoint, Google Drive, Confluence, Notion, databases, ticket systems, PDFs and web content.
Extraction, OCR where needed, structure detection, chunking, metadata tagging and incremental sync.
Vector store plus keyword index, with access-control metadata attached to every chunk.
Query rewriting, hybrid candidate generation, permission filtering, reranking and context assembly.
Grounded generation constrained to retrieved context, with citations and explicit abstention.
Retrieval recall, citation correctness, answer accuracy and unanswered-question review.
Access, privacy and oversight are part of the build rather than a later hardening phase.
Process walkthroughs, data review, constraints and a written scope you sign off before build.
Data model, integration boundaries, hosting and the security model, agreed up front.
A narrow build on your real data against an agreed quality bar, so the go-ahead is evidence-based.
Two-week increments, each ending in a working deployment and a review.
Automated coverage on critical paths, evaluation sets for AI behaviour, acceptance testing with your users.
Staged rollout into your infrastructure with monitoring and a tested rollback path.
Quality, cost and latency tracking after launch, with handover documentation or an ongoing retainer.
We are product builders as well as a services team. These are our own commercial platforms, not client references.
A virtual digital agent for sales, support and reception — trained on your business, live on WhatsApp, web, voice and email.
View product Mobility platformA ride-hailing and fleet management platform, now with agentic dispatch, driver support and demand intelligence.
View product Multivendor marketplaceA configurable multivendor service-booking marketplace with agentic onboarding, matching and support.
View productThe questions we are asked most often about this service.
It depends on your documents, and that is why we measure it. We build a question set with your experts, then report retrieval recall and answer accuracy separately. You see the numbers before go-live and decide whether the bar is met.
A common finding, and the system surfaces it rather than silently picking one. Citations show the conflict, and content owners get a report of the contradictions to resolve.
Yes. Access metadata is attached at indexing time and enforced during retrieval, so the model never sees content the user cannot access.
Incrementally, on a schedule or triggered by change events, depending on the source. Frequently changing content can sync within minutes; large archives typically run nightly.
Yes, via OCR in the ingestion pipeline. Quality depends on the scans, and we test a representative sample before committing to an approach.
LLM-powered applications and copilots grounded in your content, with evaluation before launch.
Read moreInvoices, forms and contracts read, validated against your rules and posted into your systems.
Read moreConversational systems that answer from approved content, take real actions and hand over cleanly.
Read moreLet's evaluate your requirements and design a practical, secure and scalable solution for your business. We will tell you honestly whether AI is the right tool, and outline what a first build looks like.